Moonlighting: Old trend coming to light now
Moonlighting:
Old trend coming to light now
Wipro sacked
300 employees on the ground of a ‘breach of integrity and employment contract’.
The employees were found to be working for Wipro’s competitor, even when they
were on Wipro’s payroll. That’s what is termed ‘moonlighting’. Moonlighting is
the practice of an employee working for another employer even when he is full-time
employed with one employer. Many IT companies raised concerns against
moonlighting and warned the employees of the harsh repercussions if found to be
involved in it. The Pandemic and Working from home are considered the factors
which led to the prevalence of moonlighting practices. This is not limited to
specific geography but is observed across the globe. Industry veterans like IBM,
Wipro, and Infosys termed it ‘unethical’ and cautioned employees to read the
employment contract before accepting the assignment outside the organization.
This thought implies that the employee has no discretion to utilize his/her
time even beyond working hours. If entertainment, volunteering, etc. are
acceptable activities beyond working hours, why are the activities leading to the
second source of income, not acceptable activities? Is it the insecurity on
part of the employer, decreasing his/her bargaining power as employees with another
source of income are not completely dependent on them for their income? The employers argue that moonlighting reduces
the productivity of the employee but why could it not be considered as an addition
to the learning curve and increased exposure leading to better efficiency and
effectiveness?
There is
another group of industry professionals who consider that employment is for the
number of hours that is agreed upon by the employee and the employer has no
right over the employee’s activities beyond his/her working hours. Swiggy, institutionalized
the first-of-its-kind policy, allowing ‘moonlighting’ to the extent that it
does not interfere with the productivity of employees and does not have any
conflict of interest. It is a welcome step. Institutionalizing such practice is
a sign of trust and transparency between employer & employee and relieves
the employee from the pressure of morality and ethics.
The
institutionalization and inclusion of policy to allow the employee to work for
another source of income is the wise solution to this issue. This is the future
of work and organizational policies need to be modified and clarified to
facilitate the employee to take up assignments outside the organization. Having
said that, it is equally important to draft the policies with much caution without
leaving room for manipulation and politicking.
What do you
think, if an entrepreneur can dive into multiple businesses to increase his/her
earnings, why should employees be devoid of the experience to plunge into
different waters?
Comments
Post a Comment